The online mock OSCE - a mixed-methods analysis of its benefits and overall student experience
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18573/bsdj.307Keywords:
online education, Mock OSCE, OSCE, clinical skills, clinical education, contemporary methodsAbstract
Background The social distancing requirements of the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in an inability to deliver traditional, face-to-face Mock OSCEs; a means of clinical skill learning that has been shown to be beneficial to students. This study investigated the ability of an Online Mock OSCE to replace the in-person format and assessed whether similar benefits could be obtained by this method of delivery. Methods A student-run Online Mock OSCE was designed and rolled out to Year 2 undergraduate medical students; a questionnaire was then distributed to 43 students who consented to be involved in the research. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected, with interpretation carried out via paired sample t-tests and supplementary thematic analysis. Results Comparison of pre-and-post-OSCE scores demonstrated a significant decrease in anxiety both towards summative OSCEs with similar stations and with different stations. Student confidence levels and self-reported retention of clinical skills showed statistically significant increases as a result of the Online Mock OSCE. Students had a strongly positive opinion of the process; analysis of written responses identified the provision of useful feedback on clinical skills, allowance of recognition of knowledge gaps, and enablement of increased familiarity with the assessment process as common justifications for this. Conclusions The Online Mock OSCE represents an excellent alternative to face-to-face delivery; it is well-received by students and offers a number of benefits, including decreased anxiety levels, increased confidence and improved self-reported retention of clinical skills, alongside logistical advantages of the online process. This study gives evidence for its continuing adaptation and inclusion within the medical curriculum even as in-person practice becomes feasible once more, such are the extensive assets it offers, and the potential for the method to be utilised within blended learning.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 The Author(s)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright for articles published in the journal is held by The British Student Doctor Journal.
Authors are required to complete a copyright assignment form, available here. The form specifies that authors must seek to obtain permission for publication of any content for which they do not already own the copyright, before submission of the manuscript.
The content of The British Student Doctor Journal is usually made available under a CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives) licence from Creative Commons. The licence lets others distribute the work in its original form as long as they credit the author(s) of the work.
Authors of articles in The British Student Doctor Journal may request that their work is published under a CC-BY 4.0 (Attribution) licence instead. If this is the case, then please contact the Editor-in-Chief (editorinchief@thesdj.org.uk) at the time of acceptance.
For further information about the licences, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/.
For full details of our open access and copyright policies, then please visit our website.